Why Active Voice Wins in Proposal Writing

Ashley (Kayes) Floro, CPP APMP • February 11, 2026

Active Voice: Because Evaluators Shouldn’t Have to Guess Who’s Doing What

Proposal evaluators don’t read your submission like a novel.


Evaluators review dozens—sometimes hundreds—of proposals against strict evaluation criteria, tight timelines, and scoring rubrics. They are often scanning for clarity, confidence, and proof of capability.


That’s exactly why active voice matters.


If you want your proposal to be clear, persuasive , and easy to score, then you need to use active voice. Let's break down why.



🔊1. Active Voice Is Clearer (and Faster to Process)

Active voice puts the subject—the doer of the action—front and center.


  • Passive: The system will be implemented in 90 days.
  • Active: Our team will implement the system in 90 days.


In the passive version, evaluators have to pause and mentally ask: “By whom?”

In the active version, the answer is immediate.


Clear writing reduces evaluator fatigue. And when evaluators are less fatigued, your message is more likely to land.



📢2. Active Voice Demonstrates Confidence and Accountability


Proposals are about reducing risk.


When you use active voice, you clearly state who is responsible:


  • We will deliver the training.
  • Our project manager will oversee schedule performance.
  • Our cybersecurity team will monitor threats 24/7.


This ownership signals confidence. It tells evaluators you are not hedging or hiding behind vague language. You are committing.


Passive voice, on the other hand, can unintentionally sound evasive:


  • The training will be delivered.
  • Oversight will be provided.
  • Threats will be monitored.


By whom? When? How? Active voice answers those questions without being asked.



💰3. Active Voice Keeps the Focus on the Value You Bring


A proposal is not a process manual. It’s a sales document.


Active voice keeps the spotlight on the value you bring to the customer.


Instead of: Requirements will be reviewed and documented.


Write: Our team will review all requirements and document compliance in a traceability matrix.


This subtle shift reinforces capability. It makes your organization the driver of results—not a passive participant.



🎯4. Active Voice is More Persuasive


Strong, direct verbs create momentum. They make your writing more dynamic and easier to follow. Evaluators can quickly connect actions to outcomes.


Compare:


  • Quality assurance processes will be applied to ensure compliance.
  • Our quality assurance team will apply a three-step review process to ensure 100% compliance.


The second version is specific, confident, and compelling. It gives evaluators something concrete to score.



📉5. Active Voice Reduces Ambiguity and Perceived Risk


Ambiguity increases perceived risk. Risk lowers scores.


Passive voice can blur responsibility, even unintentionally. Active voice clarifies roles, timelines, and deliverables.


When evaluators clearly see who is responsible, what will be done, and when it will be done, they are more likely to view your approach as low risk and executable.



Are There Times to Use Passive Voice?


Yes—but strategically.


Passive voice can make sense when:


  • The actor is obvious or irrelevant.
  • You want to emphasize the outcome rather than the doer.
  • You’re describing industry standards or established processes.


For example: "All data will be encrypted in transit and at rest." In this case, the emphasis is on the security measure itself, not who flips the switch.


The key is intentional use—not defaulting to passive because it feels formal.


The Bottom Line


Active voice makes your proposal:


  • Clearer
  • More confident
  • More accountable
  • More persuasive
  • Easier to score


And in competitive procurements, writing that is easier to score is often writing that scores higher.


Shows requests for information (RFIs) becoming more important
By Ashley (Kayes) Floro, CPP APMP May 5, 2026
In government contracting, the pre-solicitation phase is where requirements are shaped, vendor relationships get established, and acquisition strategies get set. Experienced teams know this, which is why they invest heavily in customer engagement, competitive intelligence, and capture planning long before a Request for Proposal (RFP) is released. But one pre-solicitation activity has historically been undervalued: the Request for Information (RFI). That's changing fast, and contractors who haven't noticed are already behind. RFIs: No Longer Just Market Research The traditional view of RFIs is simple: agencies issue them to gather information about industry capabilities before drafting a solicitation. That definition no longer captures what's happening in the current procurement landscape. Today, agencies use RFIs to define and refine requirements, test the feasibility of solutions, identify capable vendors early, and reduce the risk of poorly structured procurements. RFIs aren't just gathering information anymore, they're shaping the acquisition itself. Why Agencies Are Leaning into RFIs Several forces are pushing agencies toward deeper pre-solicitation engagement with industry, with a noticeable emphasis on RFIs. Increasing complexity. Emerging technologies and evolving mission needs mean agencies often don't know what the right solution looks like. The Government needs industry input to understand what's possible. Budget pressure. With tighter budgets and greater oversight, agencies must justify acquisition strategies earlier. RFIs let the Government validate assumptions before committing funds. Risk reduction. Poorly defined requirements lead to protests, delays, and costly rework. Getting it right before the RFP saves the Government time, money, and credibility. The result: more consequential work is happening before the RFP is ever released, and RFIs are holding more weight. The Strategic Opportunity Contractors Are Missing For contractors, this shift changes when and how opportunities are won. Responding to an RFI is no longer a courtesy or a branding exercise. It's a chance to shape how the problem is framed, introduce alternative approaches, position your capabilities as the benchmark, and influence evaluation criteria before they're finalized. Organizations that engage early often help define the playing field. By the time the RFP drops, those who sat out may find themselves reacting to requirements that already favor someone else. The Bar Is Rising RFIs are also becoming more structured. Agencies increasingly use standardized response templates, form-based submissions, and structured data collection—making it easier to compare vendors side by side. This raises the stakes for how you respond. Vague answers and marketing language don't land in structured formats. Clear, specific, well-supported responses stand out and are far more likely to influence the outcome. What To Do About It Organizations serious about win rates need to rethink how they treat RFIs: not as optional, but as strategic. This means being selective but intentional about which RFIs to pursue, aligning RFI responses with your broader capture strategy, and focusing on insight rather than just information. The goal isn't simply to answer the questions being asked: it's to shape the questions that will appear in the RFP. Final Thoughts RFIs are not new, but their role in government contracting is changing in meaningful ways. RFIs have become a critical touchpoint where agencies and industry collaborate to define problems, explore solutions, and reduce acquisition risk. For contractors, they represent one of the earliest, and most valuable, opportunities to influence an outcome. The organizations that recognize this, and act on it, are the ones best positioned to win.
By Ashley (Kayes) Floro, CPP APMP March 30, 2026
When was the last time your team truly examined why you won—or lost—a proposal? Every submission your team makes, win or lose, contains a roadmap for doing better next time. Yet many organizations treat each proposal as a standalone event, moving quickly from one bid to the next without pausing to reflect on what worked, what didn't, and why. This is a costly mistake. A structured lessons learned program, built into every stage of the business development lifecycle, is one of the most powerful tools a company can use to sharpen its competitive edge. Conducting Lessons Learned Conducting lessons learned after each proposal submission is a critical part of the business development lifecycle. It helps companies understand where they are excelling and where they need to improve. To ensure the experience is fresh in everyone's mind, each member of the proposal team should document their impressions — both positive and negative — within the first week after submission. Sample questions to consider include: Was the proposal development schedule reasonable and realistic? Why or why not? Were there any bottlenecks or major issues? If so, what were they, and how could they be mitigated in the future? Did the team work well together? If not, how could team dynamics have been improved? How effective was communication among the team? What went well? What could have been improved? Did any unexpected problems occur during proposal development? If so, how could they be mitigated going forward? Did the team stay within its B&P budget? If not, what could have been done differently? What worked best during the capture and proposal effort? What areas require improvement? A practical way to gather and analyze this feedback is to send a survey to each team member using an automated tool, which makes it easier to collate and compare responses. After Action Report Once the results are in, the Proposal Manager should review the feedback and prepare an After Action Report that details lessons learned and recommended next steps. This report should be shared with the full proposal team to ensure that insights are carried forward into future efforts. Lessons Learned Session Additionally, after contract award is announced, the team should conduct a formal Lessons Learned Session to document and discuss observations, findings, and conclusions — win or lose. By understanding where the team encountered roadblocks, and where the customer found gaps in the response, the team can address those issues and strengthen both the process and the final product on future efforts. Equally important: identify what the team is doing well and make sure those practices are preserved and repeated. Analyzing Trends and Updating Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) Conducting lessons learned after each proposal is valuable, but the benefit compounds when you step back and look at the bigger picture. On an annual basis, review your After Action Reports and lessons learned debriefs as a body of work, and analyze them for recurring themes and patterns. As the year wraps up, whether you follow a corporate fiscal year or the calendar year, ask yourself: What challenges keep surfacing? Where does the team consistently perform well? Sharing these trends with your team creates a culture of transparency and accountability, and helps focus improvement efforts where they matter most. More importantly, translate those findings into action by updating your business development and proposal SOPs. If internal feedback shows the team is consistently scrambling during production, adjust your SOPs to launch the production process earlier. If customer debriefs repeatedly cite a lack of customer understanding, take a hard look at your capture process and strengthen your call plan execution. Continuously refining your processes in response to real data is one of the clearest paths to improved performance—and more wins. Final Thoughts Every organization in this industry wants to win more, and win rates are often cited as the headline measure of a business development organization's health. While they are a useful starting point, win rates alone don't tell the whole story. Too many variables influence any single outcome. What matters more is building the discipline to learn from every effort, regardless of the result. A consistent lessons learned program, paired with annual trend analysis and a willingness to update your processes, creates a feedback loop that makes your team sharper over time. The companies that win consistently aren't just the ones with the best writers or the biggest budgets, they're the ones that treat every proposal, win or lose, as an opportunity to get better.
By Ashley (Kayes) Floro, CPP APMP March 25, 2026
Tight page limitations are continuing to be a challenge as contracting officers streamline their acquisition processes. When faced with tight page restrictions, we often find ourselves struggling with trimming five pages of material into two pages of allocated space. However, sometimes the content we are working with is so long because it is simply overly wordy. In this article, I present six tricks for eliminating waste. 1. Use Active Voice With active voice, the subject of the sentence comes first and performs the action in the sentence. Active voice is more straightforward and concise than passive voice. It typically results in shorter, sharper sentences. So not only does it take up less real estate, it flows better and is easier to understand. Passive: It was decided by the Program Manager to streamline the program. Active, Strong Verb: The Program Manager streamlined the program. 2. Eliminate Redundancies Remove redundancies that take up extra space and don’t add value. I present some examples below.